Site icon Big Bang Factory

Carbon Offsetting in the U.S.: Is There An Opportunity For International Players?

At first sight, the U.S. market of Carbon Offset is a little intimidating, starting with a first difficulty – understanding Federal vs. State initiatives. Let’s take a closer look…

Status on U.S. State Carbon Pricing Policies

Compared to command-and-control regulations (which sets specific limits for pollution emissions and/or mandates that specific pollution-control technologies must be used), carbon pricing is a market-based mechanism that creates financial incentives to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. 

Cap and trade allows the market to determine a price on carbon, which drives investment decisions and spurs market innovation. Cap and trade differs from a tax in that it provides a high level of certainty about future emissions, but not about the price of those emissions (carbon taxes do the inverse).

European countries have operated a cap-and-trade program since 2005. Several Chinese cities and provinces have had carbon caps since 2013, and the government is working toward a national program. Mexico is running a pilot cap and trade that the country hopes to bring into force in 2018.

In the U.S., eleven states (accounting for a quarter of the U.S. population and a third of GDP) have active carbon pricing programs and are successfully reducing emissions: California and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) made of ten Northeast states (Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont).

Efforts to create a nationwide cap-and-trade system in the U.S. led to House passing the American Clean Energy and Security Act (commonly called the Waxman-Markey bill, after its lead authors) in 2009, but the effort died in the Senate.

Focus on California Cap and Trade

The California cap-and-trade program, launched in 2013, is one of a suite of major policies the state is using to lower its GHG emissions. It covers the six gases defined in the Kyoto Protocol (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6), plus NF3 and other fluorinated greenhouse gases.

It is the fourth largest in the world, following the European Union, the Republic of Korea, and the Chinese province of Guangdong. 

California’s emissions trading system is expected to reduce GHG emissions from regulated entities by more than 16% between 2013 and 2020, and by an additional 40% by 2030. It is a central component of the state’s broader strategy to reduce total GHG emissions.

In terms of Geography, around 450 businesses responsible for 85% of California’s total GHG emissions must comply. Note that California has linked its program with similar programs in Ontario and Quebec, meaning that businesses in one jurisdiction can use emission allowances issued by one of the others for compliance, therefore broadening the number of businesses under the cap and leading to additional economic efficiencies.

Regarding the Industry scope, the cap-and-trade rules first applied to electric power plants and large industrial plants that emit 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year or more. Beginning in 2015, the program was extended to fuel distributors meeting the 25,000-metric ton threshold (e.g., natural gas and petroleum).

The Emission Targets also named Allowance Budget have been defined as follows:

The auction process takes place quarterly, in a single round, with a sealed bid and uniform price. The price minimum began at $10 in 2012 and increases 5% annually over inflation. As for the price maximum, additional allowances are available for sale when prices reach an upper threshold, set at $40 in 2012, increasing 5% annually over inflation. Beginning in 2021 a hard price ceiling will be set, and an unlimited supply of allowances will be available at this price. Investor-owned utilities must consign their free allowances to be sold at auction; must use proceeds for ratepayer benefit.

The Carbon Offset market(s)

A carbon offset is a reduction in emissions of GHG made in order to compensate for emissions made elsewhere. It pertains to investment in environmental projects with the sole objective of balancing carbon footprints. It’s a practice that has increasingly gained popularity globally with more and more carbon offset providers joining the initiative.

The Kyoto Protocol has sanctioned offsets as a way for governments and private companies to earn carbon credits that can be traded on a marketplace. The protocol established the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), which validates and measures projects to ensure they produce authentic benefits and are genuinely “additional” activities that would not otherwise have been undertaken. Organizations that are unable to meet their emissions quota can offset their emissions by buying CDM-approved Certified Emissions Reductions.

There are actually two identified markets for carbon offsets:

Carbon offset providers primarily work to reduce future emissions by investing in clean energy technologies, planting trees, or buying and compensating for the carbon emitted from emissions trading scheme. Offset providers widely vary in terms of their areas of focus, charges, and locations. 

Main Carbon Offset providers in the U.S.

The following players have been identified as the most noticeable.

1. Sustainable Travel International, https://sustainabletravel.org/

2. Green Mountain Energy, https://www.greenmountainenergy.com/

3. Native Energy, https://nativeenergy.com/

4. WGL Energy, https://www.wglenergy.com/

5. Cool Effect, https://www.cooleffect.org/

6. ClearSky Climate Solutions, https://www.clearskyclimatesolutions.com/

7. Sterling Planet, https://www.sterlingplanet.com/

8. 3 Degrees, https://3degreesinc.com/

9. BEF Carbon Mix, https://store.b-e-f.org/products/carbon-offsets-blend/

10. TerraPass, https://www.terrapass.com/

11. Carbon Solutions Group, http://www.carbonsolutionsgroup.com/ 

Opportunity for new entrants and international players?

Yes there is definitely an opportunity for international players, but one must be prepared and define a clear go-to-market strategy, not underestimating the complexities of the Federal vs. State regulations.

In terms of offering and marketing, for a new player entering the U.S. market of carbon offset, presenting the following attributes is a must-have:

If you want to know more about carbon offset and international specificities, please let us know. Our team is available to discuss U.S. market potential for your carbon offset business.

Author: Sylvia Gallusser, Founding Partner at big bang factory

Useful links:

https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scopingplan.htm

http://www.co2offsetresearch.org/consumer/index.html 

https://www.green-e.org/

Exit mobile version